Home / Archive / More in this area
Archived version Updated May 11, 2026 · Affirmology_Brief_v2.md
For: Jeff Parker Date: May 11, 2026 Companion to: Affirmology_Brief_v1.md (co-founder structure)
Four new pieces of information that shape this brief:
You probably know most of this, but it pays to ground in the same vocabulary.
Your deck slide 10 says $30K for 10%. That means post-money is $300K, pre-money is $270K. The pre-money is the implicit valuation you are putting on what already exists.
All assume Jeff 75%, Sol 25% pre-money before any investor cash arrives. Numbers below are approximate post-money ownership after each round completes.
Collin: $30K at $300K post-money (10%). Stop there. Bootstrap from revenue going forward.
| Holder | Pre-round | Post-round |
|---|---|---|
| Jeff | 75% | 67.5% |
| Sol | 25% | 22.5% |
| Collin | 0% | 10% |
$30K in the bank. No further dilution today. But you do not get to act on the stealth concern. Slower path to demo and conference.
Collin: $30K at $300K cap. Three months later: $100K SAFE round at $1.5M cap from 4 to 5 others.
| Holder | Pre-round | After Collin | After Second Tranche |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jeff | 75% | 67.5% | 63.0% |
| Sol | 25% | 22.5% | 21.0% |
| Collin | 0% | 10% | 9.3% |
| Others (combined) | 0% | 0% | 6.7% |
$130K total. Founders retain 84% combined. Two rounds means two negotiations but it sequences naturally with the September conference momentum.
One SAFE template, one cap (say $1M post-money). Collin's $30K = 3%. Sister's boyfriend at $50K = 5%. Others at $5 to 10K each = 0.5 to 1%.
| Holder | Pre-round | Post-round |
|---|---|---|
| Jeff | 75% | 65.25% |
| Sol | 25% | 21.75% |
| All investors combined | 0% | 13% |
Cleanest cap table. Simplest paperwork. Risk: Collin sees the deck said 10% and now the actual offer is 3%. He could feel walked back on. Solution requires an honest conversation about why the cap moved.
Collin gets his $30K SAFE at $300K cap (matches what you offered, makes him the named lead investor). $100K from others on SAFEs at $1.5M cap (reflecting Collin's anchor + the conference traction story + Sol joining as co-founder).
| Holder | Pre-round | After Collin | After Others |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jeff | 75% | 67.5% | 63.0% |
| Sol | 25% | 22.5% | 21.0% |
| Collin | 0% | 10% | 9.3% |
| Others (combined) | 0% | 0% | 6.7% |
Same end-state as Scenario B, executed as one continuous fundraise instead of two. Founders retain 84%. $130K raised. Collin is happy because he got the deck terms and is named lead. Others are happy because the higher cap reflects the momentum his check created. This is the standard friends-and-family playbook with a lead anchor.
Reasoning:
For Collin today: do not introduce the tiered cap idea unless he is asking detailed questions. Today is about whether he is in or out at the deck terms. If he is in, the follow-up sounds like: "I want you as my lead investor. I'm also opening the round to 4 to 5 more investors at a higher cap that reflects your anchor commitment and the conference traction story. Your terms stay exactly as offered." This is normal and respected. Lead investors expect favorable terms relative to followers.
For the second-tier investors after Collin commits: "Collin Last Name committed $30K at our anchor terms. The remaining round is at a $1.5M cap. Minimum check $5K, max $50K. Same SAFE template for everyone in this tranche." Clean. Done.
For Sol's network specifically: the sister's boyfriend at $50K, the benefactor at whatever amount, and any others all come in at the $1.5M cap as part of the second tranche. They sign the same SAFE template as the rest. Critical: the founder operating agreement is signed BEFORE their checks land. They see the structure (Sol's 25%, vesting, romantic-dissolution clause, leaver provisions) and know exactly what they are signing into. No surprises later.
You named the right risk. The Affirmology insight (spiritual personalization + AI audio + Gene Keys + transit subscription) is genuinely defensible, but not by hiding the deck. The real moats are:
A tech founder copying your deck cannot replicate any of these. So the deck does not need to be confidential beyond a verbal "please keep this between us" or an NDA on request. The real protection is being first to market with a magical demo. That means moving fast.
Sequencing for speed:
Fast enough to beat anyone copying you. Slow enough to do the founder structure correctly.
Realistic and achievable, given your background:
Total upfront legal cost: roughly $125 for LLC filing, $0 for SAFE template, $0 for operating agreement template (we draft together), $0 to $600 for optional attorney review later. Versus $5K to $15K for full retained counsel from day one. Acceptable trade for now. The moment Affirmology has a committed check or real revenue, the paid attorney review becomes affordable and worth doing.
Just a quick note after your meeting with Collin:
That info shapes how aggressive to be on the operating agreement timeline and whether to push the second tranche immediately or wait for the demo to crystallize.
| Stage | Jeff | Sol | Collin | Others | Total Outside Capital |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Today, before any check | 75% | 25% | 0% | 0% | $0 |
| After founder agreement signed | 75% | 25% | 0% | 0% | $0 |
| After Collin closes | 67.5% | 22.5% | 10% | 0% | $30K |
| After second tranche closes | 63.0% | 21.0% | 9.3% | 6.7% | $130K |
| If a future $500K round at $3M cap | 52.5% | 17.5% | 7.75% | 5.6% | $630K |
Even at the future-round projection, founders retain 70% combined. That is healthy and runway-friendly.
You mentioned being fine with her sister's eventual CEO role coming out of your share. That is generous and reasonable, but do not commit to it yet. The right time to formalize that is when she actually steps in operationally, not now. She would receive an equity grant from the unallocated pool plus a vesting schedule plus a CEO-level package. That conversation lives in year two or three, not today.
For now: keep the structure clean, keep the pool unallocated, leave the door open without putting numbers on it.
I will draft the operating agreement next, after you brief me on how the Collin meeting goes.